Private Credit Concerns Fail to Fluster Bonds, Have Stocks on Edge

A person with a backpack stands on a mountain ledge overlooking distant blue hills. Text reads Market Sense by HB Wealth: Private Credit Concerns Fail to Fluster Bonds, Have Stocks on Edge. March 4, 2026.

It is no secret that private credit redemptions are rising as concerns about default risk hamper performance of this most beloved asset class. As the “Golden Age” of private credit normalizes, we may continue to see liquidity pressures rise and questions about underlying loan valuations emerge. As financial markets remain on guard for signs of eroding credit quality, spreads and equities can shed some light on contagion risks. So far public market spreads remain quite calm, but equities are wobbly, with BDCs struggling and insurance stocks showing some anxiety.

Credit Spreads Suggest Little Concern

Credit spreads offer a lens on the broader markets’ interpretation of credit quality and default risk, and across the board show no sign of material deterioration. While off their tightest levels reached in early 2025, even the lowest quality high yield bond spreads are still very tight compared to other periods of stress. Last year, when tariff policy was emerging, Caa spreads touched 850 bps, still well above the current level of 628 bps. On average, Caa spreads rose 584 bps in mid-cycle corrections like 2011, 2015, 2018, and 2022, and touched at least 1000 basis points in each instance.

Even Bloomberg Aggregate-eligible BDC credit spreads, arguably closest among categories to the private credit market, appear remarkably contained at this time. This aggregate has limited history, but at its peak in March 2023, the BDC spread touched 387 bps. Currently the spread of 251 bps is about equivalent to the spread touched in 2025.

A line graph titled Credit Spreads Over Time shows multiple credit spread categories from 2004 to 2024. The US Corp HY category spikes in 2008 and 2020, while others fluctuate at lower levels throughout.

Watch Banks and Insurance Stocks for Contagion Risk

Equity markets appear a bit more concerned than credit markets. BDCs, arguably a public market canary in the private credit coal mine, have taken a significant dive in recent months. Also, while there appears little sign of concern that strains from private credit will erode performance of banks, insurance companies are struggling a bit. History suggests both groups will likely sell off significantly if a broader risk of contagion emerges.

BDC equities (the S&P BDC index includes Ares, Bain Capital, Blackstone, Blue Owl, etc.) have struggled with a 23.7% decline from recent peak reached in July 2025 and are now trading below 2022 levels. Intriguingly, BDCs have been in a long-term bear market that dates back to the index peak prior to the financial crisis. The equities recovered to a post crisis peak in 2013 and struggled since then. Public BDCs are capital constrained as they cannot issue equity when their stock is below book value. The strong flows into direct lending have largely come through private BDCs as they can raise nearly unlimited amounts of capital. Nonetheless, the recent decline in equity values and increasing discount to NAV in public BDCs is likely partly due to an expected rise in defaults for the industry.

Movements in the value of BDCs usually coincide with movements in bank and insurance stocks as perceptions about default risk flow through to portfolio asset valuations. Concerns about private credit markets are so far dimming optimism in insurance companies but are not impacting the banking sector as much. Banks, represented by the KBW index, are down 10% from their peak in early February, but just back to levels last recorded in December. The group is still up more than 15% compared to this time last year. Insurance stocks, represented by the S&P Insurance Index, have dropped 10% from their peak in April 2025, and are down 7.2% from a year ago.

Notably, in the years prior to the financial crisis, banks, insurance and BDCs were very tightly correlated. The correlation between banks, BDCs, and insurance companies and BDCs averaged 0.88 in the three years before the financial crisis. The correlation has been nearly cut in half in the post-pandemic era. If private credit risk becomes a broader systemic risk, a tighter correlation should emerge.

Line graph comparing S&P BDC, KBW, and S&P Insurance Indexes from 2007 to 2024, showing BDC outperforming, especially after 2020, reaching highest value, while other indexes grow more modestly.

Disclosure: HB Wealth is an SEC-registered investment adviser. The information reflects the author’s views, opinions, and analyses as the publication date. The information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any investment product. This information contains forward-looking statements, predictions, and forecasts (“forward-looking statements”) concerning the belief and opinions in respect to the future. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and undue reliance should not be placed on them. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. The information does not represent legal, tax, accounting, or investment advice; recipients should consult their respective advisors regarding such matters. Certain information herein is based on third-party sources believed to be reliable, but which have not been independently verified. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results; inherent in any investment is the risk of loss.

A woman with long brown hair wearing a blue blazer and a necklace smiles at the camera. The background is softly blurred with light and blue tones.

Gina Martin Adams, CFA, CMT

Chief Market Strategist, Shareholder

Gina Martin Adams, CFA, CMT, is the Chief Market Strategist for HB Wealth. With more than 25 years of experience at leading global financial institutions, Adams brings deep expertise in market analysis, thematic research, and translating complex economic trends into actionable strategies. She collaborates with HB Wealth’s investment team to deliver timely market perspectives, share actionable insights, and enhance the firm’s visibility as a leading voice in the industry. She contributes to advancing proprietary research, supporting the development of new investment products, and enhancing the client experience through thought leadership and education. She pursues a top-down perspective and model-based approach, leveraging fundamental, technical, and quantitative perspectives to inform investment decisions, and frequently presents her views in the media and at industry conferences, professional associations and investment organizations.

A young man with short brown hair, wearing a dark suit, white shirt, and blue tie, stands in front of a blurred background with lights and blue tones.

Matthew Sanders

Senior Investment Research Analyst

Related Insights & News

GDP Forecast is Under Fire. Why Aren’t Earnings Following Suit?

While strains from the conflict in Iran are already apparent in economists’ GDP forecasts, S&P…

Read More

Ceasefire Reduces Downside Risks but Supply Strains Remain a Drag

Ceasefire in the Middle East is undoubtedly encouraging news, and if it leads to peace…

Read More

Analysts May Need to Capitulate Before Stocks Can Make a Final Low

U.S. equity market valuations are starting to reflect inevitable inflation and growth risks of war…

Read More

If Bond Market is Right, Stocks Face an Inflation Reckoning


Even if the recent spike in commodity costs proves fleeting, a secular reality of higher…

Read More

The above is not a recommendation to purchase or sell a particular security and is not legal, investment or tax advice. Results are not guaranteed. All investing involves risk.

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results for any investment. Private alternative investments are not for every client. An individual must be qualified to invest in a private investment based on their net worth and/or other criteria, and they may qualify to invest in some alternative investments while not being allowed to invest in other alternative investments. Alternative investments are not risk-free and there is no guarantee of achieving attractive performance compared to similar liquid investments. Risks associated with investments in private alternatives include the illiquid nature of such investments, risks associated with leveraged investments, manager-specific risks, sector-specific risks, and in certain cases geographical risk, as well as the risk of loss of principal.