The Inflation Clock is Ticking on Earnings as Gulf Hints at 2022-redux in 2026


War in the Middle East and closure of the Strait of Hormuz has resulted in the largest spike in commodity costs since the start of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022. Though the 2022 experience does not offer a perfect benchmark for what to expect this time, there are similarities in market responses – the commodity price spike and initial equity market shrug happened in the early phases of 2022’s experience as well. While the U.S. economy managed to survive the 2022 struggle without a declaration of official recession, the experience gave markets a lesson in how supply-constrained inflation surges can create earnings recessions and may set a precedent for what to expect should commodity supplies remain constrained much longer in the Middle East.

2022 vs 2026: Similarities and Differences

Every supply shock has different consequences for markets, and outcomes can be highly contingent on the nature and extent of the shock at hand. Almost certainly, the outcome of the surprising surge in commodity prices on account of war in the Middle East in 2026 will not play out precisely like the Russia-Ukraine war did in 2022. There are arguably more economic and policy differences than there are similarities between the periods. The economy was in its early cycle recovery phase after the 2020 pandemic shutdown, and the Fed was tightening rates in 2022 after letting the economy run hot in the immediate post pandemic period. Job growth averaged 0.25% MoM that year, quite the contrast to the approximately 0% average growth of the last six months. Artificial intelligence was not yet a major driver of equities – Nvidia traded for less than $20 a share. However, there is one notable similarity – commodity costs. The last time broad commodity prices (represented by Bloomberg’s Commodity Index) accelerated to their current level was in 2022. In fact, because of the recent surge in precious metals prices, the broad index has reached a higher level this year than it did at its peak in 2022.

Line graph comparing the Bloomberg Commodity Index and CPI inflation rate from 2021 to early 2026, showing a steep rise in commodities and a moderate rise in CPI, both peaking in 2026.

Back then, oil prices escalated to more than $100 per barrel just 4 days after Russia invaded Ukraine, held around that level or higher through July of that year, and global food costs surged with the disruption to Europe’s breadbasket. Stocks shrugged off the initial surge, assuming the war would be short lived. In the first two weeks of the Russia-Ukraine war, the S&P 500 dropped just 0.6%.

Line graph showing S&P 500 performance after the start of the Ukraine-Russia war and the US/Israel-Iran war. Both lines show a sharp decline, with some fluctuations, over about 220 trading days.

Inflation Pressure Resulted in Earnings Recession in 2022

But as the war dragged on (and pandemic shutdowns emerged in China, further exacerbating supply constraints), prices surged. Producer price growth escalated to a peak of 11.7% year-over-year in March 2022, and consumer prices followed, topping out at 9.1% growth that year. Notably, the economy weathered the storm reasonably well. GDP slowed from its rapid 2021 recovery pace as real personal consumption (PCE) was stopped in its tracks by the diversion of spending to necessities and away from discretionary items. Real PCE growth averaged just 0.14% per month in 2022, well beneath the average pace of 0.59% per month in 2021.

The effect of the price escalations was very clear in S&P 500 earnings, even if it was not clear in the economy at large. Energy sector earnings rose to new highs in 2022, reflecting the elevation in commodity costs, but the rest of the sectors suffered. Over five quarters of decline from the end of 2021 to early 2023, S&P 500 earnings excluding the energy sector dropped. Notably, despite evidence of slowdown in GDP growth as consumers retrenched somewhat, S&P 500 revenues held up, and continued to grow. But earnings declined as margins compressed due to commodity cost pressures.

Line graph comparing S&P 500 Ex Energy revenue and net income (in thousands) from 2012 to 2028, showing both metrics rising steadily, with revenue consistently higher than net income.

The What started as an earnings boost to the energy sector turned into a broader earnings recession for the other sectors in the index, as input costs rose quickly and compressed margins. Initially, earnings growth estimates rose, and indeed, energy sector earnings accelerated to help drive index earnings higher in the first quarter of the commodity cost spike. But ultimately, higher prices weighed on earnings for non-energy S&P 500 sectors, and tipped the index at large into an earnings recession.

Line graph comparing S&P 500 and S&P 500 excluding energy net income (in thousands) from 2013 to 2028, showing a significant divergence after 2022, with the S&P 500 rising sharply.

Conclusion: The Clock is Ticking

There is no certainty that commodity costs will stay high as long as they did in 2022, and certainly the stage of economic conditions is different in 2026 than it was in 2022. Nonetheless, commodity prices are already matching levels touched during the inflationary surge in 2022, and present considerable risk to earnings if they do not cool in short order. Markets have greeted the crisis with relative calm, just as they did early in 2022. That year, it took 2 months of elevated commodity prices to dismantle the equity market’s sanguine view, and 5 months of elevated oil prices to create a recession in earnings. At just two weeks in, there is still time for resolution, but the clock is ticking. The longer the war in the Middle East extends, the more likely it becomes that a 2022-style earnings challenge emerges in 2026.

Disclosure: HB Wealth is an SEC-registered investment adviser. The information reflects the author’s views, opinions, and analyses as the publication date. The information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any investment product. This information contains forward-looking statements, predictions, and forecasts (“forward-looking statements”) concerning the belief and opinions in respect to the future. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and undue reliance should not be placed on them. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. The information does not represent legal, tax, accounting, or investment advice; recipients should consult their respective advisors regarding such matters. Certain information herein is based on third-party sources believed to be reliable, but which have not been independently verified. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results; inherent in any investment is the risk of loss.

A woman with long brown hair wearing a blue blazer and a necklace smiles at the camera. The background is softly blurred with light and blue tones.

Gina Martin Adams, CFA, CMT

Chief Market Strategist, Shareholder

Gina Martin Adams, CFA, CMT, is the Chief Market Strategist for HB Wealth. With more than 25 years of experience at leading global financial institutions, Adams brings deep expertise in market analysis, thematic research, and translating complex economic trends into actionable strategies. She collaborates with HB Wealth’s investment team to deliver timely market perspectives, share actionable insights, and enhance the firm’s visibility as a leading voice in the industry. She contributes to advancing proprietary research, supporting the development of new investment products, and enhancing the client experience through thought leadership and education. She pursues a top-down perspective and model-based approach, leveraging fundamental, technical, and quantitative perspectives to inform investment decisions, and frequently presents her views in the media and at industry conferences, professional associations and investment organizations.

A young man with short brown hair, wearing a dark suit, white shirt, and blue tie, stands in front of a blurred background with lights and blue tones.

Matthew Sanders

Senior Investment Research Analyst

Related Insights & News

A Deep Dive: Will 2026’s Unicorns Pierce the Market’s Armor or Prove to Be Trusty Steeds?

Abstract:2026 could be the best year for IPOs on record based on already completed deals…

Read More

Emerging Markets are Outperforming and Getting Cheaper at the Same Time

Emerging Market equities are on pace for a second consecutive year of outperforming U.S. stocks,…

Read More

A Deep Dive: Magnificent-Seven’s Breakup Continues Amid Capex Boom

Abstract:The Magnificent Seven has managed to recover its year-to-date loss with April’s rally, though most…

Read More

A Deep Dive: New Fed Chair May Create New Regime for Financial Markets

Abstract: Monetary Policy Faces Three Big Changes with New Fed Chair With a new Chair…

Read More

The above is not a recommendation to purchase or sell a particular security and is not legal, investment or tax advice. Results are not guaranteed. All investing involves risk.

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results for any investment. Private alternative investments are not for every client. An individual must be qualified to invest in a private investment based on their net worth and/or other criteria, and they may qualify to invest in some alternative investments while not being allowed to invest in other alternative investments. Alternative investments are not risk-free and there is no guarantee of achieving attractive performance compared to similar liquid investments. Risks associated with investments in private alternatives include the illiquid nature of such investments, risks associated with leveraged investments, manager-specific risks, sector-specific risks, and in certain cases geographical risk, as well as the risk of loss of principal.