A Deep Dive If Manufacturing Recovery Turns a K into a V, Small Caps should benefit

Abstract:

  • The manufacturing economy has been in a recession since 2022 but appears to finally be turning a corner. This supports the outlook for small cap stocks relative to large caps
  • Technology was the only manufacturing industry growing prior to 2026, resulting in a “K-shaped” experience in U.S. manufacturing. Other industries like chemicals, machinery and transportation industries now appear to be recovering.
  • The lack of a “V-shaped” manufacturing bounce over the last three years has held returns for economic-sensitive stocks like small caps at bay, resulting in a performance shortfall relative to large caps that has started to close over the last year. If the recent manufacturing recovery expands to more industries, expected equity returns may continue to improve.

After a Three-Year Recession, Manufacturing Might Be Turning the Corner 

The manufacturing economy may be turning a corner for the first time in three years, and this could support new leadership in US stocks. Measures of manufacturing activity have hinted at a recession-like experience for the last several years, as robust technology activity has contrasted with contraction in other industries. However, there are some signs that the tide is beginning to turn. As other industries show signs of growth, the ISM manufacturing survey has bounced into expansion to kick off 2026. Growth is still too slow to suggest the economy at large has reached escape velocity, and this may keep large cap stocks’ returns somewhat constrained, but recovery in lagging industries may support rotation in U.S. equites that favors small cap stocks.  

Purchasing Managers Indexes Hit Inflection

The ISM manufacturing survey has had just three consecutive positive readings so far in 2026, the first time since November 2022- the longest stretch on record without a meaningful expansion. The flip to expansion this year in ISM’s gauge has been led by a relatively healthy combination of new orders, production and supplier deliveries. During the initial recovery from the Covid-19 recession, supply chains were stretched amid a surge in orders – helping drive the extreme price inflation that haunted the economy and forced the Federal Reserve’s hand toward an aggressive rate hike and quantitative tightening cycle from 2022-2024. This experience also led to a surge in inventories that plagued the manufacturing sector for years.  Overstocking for what turned out to be a very slow growth environment amid inflation pressures led to a prolonged period of inventory drawdowns and sluggish orders – until 2026.  

Bar and line graph showing US ISM Manufacturing PMI Drivers from 2020 to early 2026, with colored bars for New Orders, Production, Employment, Inventories, and Supplier Deliveries, and an overall PMI value line.

In the first three months of 2026, manufacturing jumped into expansion territory, powered by new orders, production and supplier deliveries.  Notably, these recoveries overwhelmed a continued drag from inventories on the headline results.  While war-time escalation in oil prices remains a risk to the outlook, there is very little evidence of impact so far in regional Fed surveys of manufacturing activity, which continue to paint a broadly constructive manufacturing picture. 

The national ISM manufacturing survey will be released later this week, but NY and Philly beat expectations convincingly, Kansas City and Richmond held in expansion, and Dallas edged down. The consistent thread across all five is sharply rising price pressures, particularly for inputs, likely reflecting energy cost pass-through from the current Middle East situation, but not enough to throw the sector back into recession territory.

K-Shaped Manufacturing Economy Could be Changing in 2026

Sectoral details within manufacturing may be most critical to watch if the broadening trade that started this year is to continue. After several years in which technology was the only consistent contributor to manufacturing output among major industries, other industries have started to emerge from contraction in 2026. Our summary of readings across the six largest industries in the ISM’s survey shows how dominant computer and electronics has been as other industries struggled in contraction in recent years. Supported by data center and AI hardware demand, technology manufacturing expanded throughout most of 2024 and 2025, but it was joined only fleetingly by other segments such as chemical products, transportation, consumer staples and machinery. Those other groups are finally experiencing some expansion in 2026.

A bar chart showing monthly expansion (green) and contraction (red) for six major U.S. manufacturing industries from Jan 2023 to Mar 2026, with categories like chemical products, machinery, and petroleum & coal.

Industrial production, a measure of manufacturing output, shows clearly the degree to which tech single-handedly grew while other sectors languished in recent years. High-tech production has jumped by about 50% in the post-pandemic era, leaving behind other groups, where production is still below pre-pandemic levels.

Line graph comparing industrial production from 2019 to 2026; Hi-Tech production rises steadily, reaching 183.0, while Manufacturing Ex Hi-Tech remains mostly flat, ending at 95.4.

Momentum in production has slowed a touch recently, as the business optimism evident in the ISM surveys of manufacturing businesses has not yet translated into real economic activity. The tech surge was enough to create growth in industrial production at large since early 2025, but recent sputters for tech spending may suggest a need for other sectors to contribute to keep overall production rising.  

As a result of the concentration in tech and limited improvement in other production industries so far, capacity utilization (which measures the extent to which the US economy is using its production capabilities) has been trending lower since the initial recovery from the covid-19 recession. Now at 75.7%, it is approaching the 75% level that typically indicates manufacturing recession in the U.S.

Both ISM manufacturing PMI and capacity utilization are key inputs into our economic cycle model that we last published on here (Market Sense Deep Dive: Goldilocks May Lower Stocks’ Temperature). In 2026, the model has indicated somewhat lackluster returns are likely for the broad market, as the economy struggles with mediocre – not too hot, nor too cold – growth.  Maximum potential returns for stocks, as signaled by the economic cycle, likely passed with manufacturing activity contraction, and so far, the second-best state for market returns – robust growth – remains elusive.  Continued acceleration in non-tech industry activity could help the economy achieve lift-off and improve prospective returns.

Bar chart showing S&P 500 forward returns over 3, 6, and 12 months, categorized by ISM PMI cycle phases. Returns are highest in Expansion+Accelerating phases, especially over 12 months (15.44%), and lowest in Contraction+Decelerating phases.

In the meantime, and as we noted in our note (Market Sense: With Small Caps Leading the Way, U.S. Stocks’ Role Reversal Has Legs), stronger manufacturing activity may remain a support for Russell 2000 forward performance.  Small caps have historically traded in pretty close alignment with the ISM, outperforming large caps when ISM rose and underperforming when ISM fell.  Like large caps, small caps historically performed best when the ISM was in contraction, but recovering from its low.  This recent period of K-shaped recovery has been particularly challenging for small caps, as the normal sequence of sharp drop and subsequent recovery (otherwise knows as a “V-bottom”) did not occur in manufacturing, resulting in unusually lackluster performance for the style.  If the ISM continues to accelerate in expansion territory, turning what has been a K-shaped recovery into more of a V-shape, we expect small caps may start to make up ground relative to large caps.

Line chart comparing ISM Manufacturing PMI (dark blue) and Russell 2000/S&P 500 ratio (light blue) from 1980 to 2025, showing similar trends and a sharp decline in both after 2021, with arrows marking recent downward movement.

Disclosure: HB Wealth is an SEC registered investment adviser. The information reflects the author’s views, opinions, and analyses as the publication date. The information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any investment product. This information contains forward-looking statements, predictions, and forecasts (“forward-looking statements”) concerning the belief and opinions in respect to the future. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and undue reliance should not be placed on them. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. The information does not represent legal, tax, accounting, or investment advice; recipients should consult their respective advisors regarding such matters. Certain information herein is based on third-party sources believed to be reliable, but which have not been independently verified. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results; inherent in any investment is the risk of loss.

A woman with long brown hair wearing a blue blazer and a necklace smiles at the camera. The background is softly blurred with light and blue tones.

Gina Martin Adams, CFA, CMT

Chief Market Strategist, Shareholder

Gina Martin Adams, CFA, CMT, is the Chief Market Strategist for HB Wealth. With more than 25 years of experience at leading global financial institutions, Adams brings deep expertise in market analysis, thematic research, and translating complex economic trends into actionable strategies. She collaborates with HB Wealth’s investment team to deliver timely market perspectives, share actionable insights, and enhance the firm’s visibility as a leading voice in the industry. She contributes to advancing proprietary research, supporting the development of new investment products, and enhancing the client experience through thought leadership and education. She pursues a top-down perspective and model-based approach, leveraging fundamental, technical, and quantitative perspectives to inform investment decisions, and frequently presents her views in the media and at industry conferences, professional associations and investment organizations.

A young man with short brown hair, wearing a dark suit, white shirt, and blue tie, stands in front of a blurred background with lights and blue tones.

Matthew Sanders

Senior Investment Research Analyst

A man in a blue suit and tie smiles at the camera against a blurred blue and white background.

Michael Casper, CFA

Director, Senior Market Strategist

Related Insights & News

Emerging Markets are Outperforming and Getting Cheaper at the Same Time

Emerging Market equities are on pace for a second consecutive year of outperforming U.S. stocks,…

Read More

A Deep DiveMagnificent-Seven’s Breakup Continues Amid Capex Boom

Abstract:The Magnificent Seven has managed to recover its year-to-date loss with April’s rally, though most…

Read More

A Deep Dive: New Fed Chair May Create New Regime for Financial Markets

Abstract: Monetary Policy Faces Three Big Changes with New Fed Chair With a new Chair…

Read More

Warsh Fed Could Spell Trouble for Already Tight Equity Risk Premium

 Abstract: Equity Risk Premium’s Normalization More About Real Rates Than Expensive Stocks The equity risk…

Read More

The above is not a recommendation to purchase or sell a particular security and is not legal, investment or tax advice. Results are not guaranteed. All investing involves risk.

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results for any investment. Private alternative investments are not for every client. An individual must be qualified to invest in a private investment based on their net worth and/or other criteria, and they may qualify to invest in some alternative investments while not being allowed to invest in other alternative investments. Alternative investments are not risk-free and there is no guarantee of achieving attractive performance compared to similar liquid investments. Risks associated with investments in private alternatives include the illiquid nature of such investments, risks associated with leveraged investments, manager-specific risks, sector-specific risks, and in certain cases geographical risk, as well as the risk of loss of principal.