It’s Not Just Mega-IPOs, US Issuance Pipeline is Exceptionally Strong

Abstract:

  •  The pipeline of US IPOs remains strong with Anthropic expected to go public in October, though nothing is finalized yet.
  • 2026 has already met 2025’s deal count and could approach the all time high IPO value from 2021 if Anthropic IPOs this year. 
  • New issues have performed well this year, though short of the gain for IPOs in the lead up to the dot-com bubble. However, market undercurrents have helped with just under half of IPOs outperforming the market in 2026.
  • Fast track rules established by Russell, Nasdaq and MSCI will almost certainly kick in for Anthropic, putting the stock in respective indices shortly after IPO. S&P maintains its 12-month seasoning period prior to inclusion.

SpaceX, Anthropic and OpenAI are getting all the hype but the pipeline of US IPOs appears exceptionally strong amid a resurgence in issuance over the past year. Anthropic is likely to be the next mega-IPO, set to go public in mid-October at a valuation that could possibly top SpaceX’s for the largest new issue ever. OpenAI, on the other hand, looks poised to IPO sometime in 2027. Though SpaceX had a rough stretch until recently, dragging on performance, new issues have done well this year hinting at solid risk appetite – and confirming the market’s ability to absorb a massive influx of shares. But gains for recent listings remain well short of the frenzy that accompanied the runup to the dot-com bubble.

2026’s IPOs Have Done Well, But It’s Been Somewhat Hit or Miss

So far, 2026 has been a strong year for new issuance, nearly matching 2025’s deal count before the book has even closed on the third quarter. Since the start of the year, there’s been 223 IPOs that are trading, representing $156 billion in value. That’s just a shade off 2025’s 230 IPOs but is the second-best year on record to 2021 on deal value, aided by SpaceX’s $75 billion listing back in mid-June. Anthropic’s IPO alone – estimated to seek up to $100 billion in funding – would put the year within a stone’s throw of 2021’s $297 billion value with another $7.5 billion already announced in the pipeline. Of the announced IPOs, Holtec Nuclear Corp, American Savings Bank, Salspera, Narragansett Bancorp and Rokit America are expected to be the largest.

This year’s IPOs have likewise fared well once they started trading. On average so far this year, new issues have gained 20.1% on the first day, 22.8% over their first month, and 28% since inception, respectively. While the first day trading gain is better than long term average of 18.9%, daily performance still falls well short of the 64.6% the average IPO gained in the first trading day during 1999-2000 (based on data from Jay Ritter at the University of Florida). However, the subsequent 1-day and 1-month gains are well above 2021’s 10.7% and 7.7%, respectively when easy money policies and fiscal stimulus drove markets to a mini-bubble that collapsed with the subsequent bear market. The year’s average gain since going public is stronger than the 1980-2024 average one-year gain (5.6%) but have been aided by strong market undercurrents. A bit less than half of companies that IPOed this year (49.4%) outperformed the S&P 500 over the same period.

Based on data from the University of Florida, unprofitable IPOs (up an average 26.5%) have outperformed profitable ones (up 13.3%) in the first day of trading since 1980, even though they on average underperform over the subsequent three-years. That short term “pop” favoring unprofitable companies has occurred again this year, with IPOs of companies in the black up just 8.1% versus 28.9% for those in the red. SpaceX’s IPO was the most notable unprofitable new issue this year and the company reported much higher than expected capex – a pressure point for investors this season – leading to a nearly 14% drop the following day that was compounded by fears of an impending influx of shares triggered by the expiration of one of its lockups following the report. The stock has helped Russell 1000 telecom — the sector it was put in due to Starlink’s contribution to its earnings – to a volatile summer.

Anthropic: What We Know About the IPO

Anthropic filed a confidential S-1 with the SEC detailing their intention to IPO back in June, and the latest rumors suggest that the company could go public in October, though nothing is finalized. The company could seek up to $100 billion at a $2 trillion valuation – making it larger than SpaceX’s $75 billion offering at a valuation of roughly $1.75 trillion. While the float – the shares available to the public – looks likely to be similar to SpaceX’s, the most recent reporting suggests Anthropic is weighing a much different lockup expiration structure. SpaceX has a staggered and relatively accelerated lockup expiration while Anthropic is said to be considering allowing insiders to sell some shares at IPO, with a plan to keep the remainder locked up past the typical 180-day period that most IPOs target. That could help limit initial volatility around the stock relative to SpaceX’s structure.

Nonetheless, indices that adopted fast-track rules for new IPO inclusion are likely to see Anthropic included in short order given its size. S&P was the lone holdout, keeping its 12-month seasoning rules and profitability requirements in place ahead of SpaceX’s issue. However, Nasdaq will allow Anthropic into its indices as soon as 15 days after the IPO if the company ranks within the top 40 stocks by market cap (it will, given its current valuation). Similarly, Russell will include the stock 5 days after its IPO and MSCI will add Anthropic after 10 days. 


Disclosure: HB Wealth is an SECregistered investment adviser. The information reflects the author’s views, opinions, and analyses as the publication date. The information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any investment product. This information contains forward-looking statements, predictions, and forecasts (“forward-looking statements”) concerning the belief and opinions in respect to the future. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and undue reliance should not be placed on them. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. The information does not represent legal, tax, accounting, or investment advice; recipients should consult their respective advisors regarding such matters. Certain information herein is based on third-party sources believed to be reliable, but which have not been independently verified. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results; inherent in any investment is the risk of loss.

A woman with long brown hair wearing a blue blazer and a necklace smiles at the camera. The background is softly blurred with light and blue tones.

Gina Martin Adams, CFA, CMT

Chief Market Strategist, Shareholder

Gina Martin Adams, CFA, CMT, is the Chief Market Strategist for HB Wealth. With more than 25 years of experience at leading global financial institutions, Adams brings deep expertise in market analysis, thematic research, and translating complex economic trends into actionable strategies. She collaborates with HB Wealth’s investment team to deliver timely market perspectives, share actionable insights, and enhance the firm’s visibility as a leading voice in the industry. She contributes to advancing proprietary research, supporting the development of new investment products, and enhancing the client experience through thought leadership and education. She pursues a top-down perspective and model-based approach, leveraging fundamental, technical, and quantitative perspectives to inform investment decisions, and frequently presents her views in the media and at industry conferences, professional associations and investment organizations.

A man in a blue suit and tie smiles at the camera against a blurred blue and white background.

Michael Casper, CFA

Director, Senior Market Strategist

A young man with short brown hair, wearing a dark suit, white shirt, and blue tie, stands in front of a blurred background with lights and blue tones.

Matthew Sanders

Senior Investment Research Analyst

Related Insights & News

Fundamentals Continue to Power Stock’s Astonishing Advance

Abstract: The AI-powered earnings advance is the gift that keeps on giving to stocks, as…

Read More

Lessons from Investment Booms Past

Abstract: Contrary to popular narratives, investment booms of the last 150 years do not show…

Read More

Momentum Explains Much of the Wide Style Dispersion this Year

Abstract:  Growth and value indices are sending a lot of mixed messages this year. Russell…

Read More

Breadth Sending Bullish Cues as Capitalization Distorts Sector View

Abstract: Breadth Sending Bullish Cues as Capitalization Distorts Sector View Resurgent price breadth and a…

Read More

The above is not a recommendation to purchase or sell a particular security and is not legal, investment or tax advice. Results are not guaranteed. All investing involves risk.

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results for any investment. Private alternative investments are not for every client. An individual must be qualified to invest in a private investment based on their net worth and/or other criteria, and they may qualify to invest in some alternative investments while not being allowed to invest in other alternative investments. Alternative investments are not risk-free and there is no guarantee of achieving attractive performance compared to similar liquid investments. Risks associated with investments in private alternatives include the illiquid nature of such investments, risks associated with leveraged investments, manager-specific risks, sector-specific risks, and in certain cases geographical risk, as well as the risk of loss of principal.