Depleting Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) Clouds the Fed’s Path if Hormuz Doesn’t Open

The US’ strategic petroleum reserve (SPR) is hitting some of the lowest levels since the 1980s as drawdowns reaccelerated with the conflict in Iran and could approach its lower limits if a proposed peace deal falls through yet again or if traffic in the Strait of Hormuz remains limited. The physical floor – roughly 20% of maximum storage – is still quite a way away but certainly limits the amount that can be pushed to the market if the Strait doesn’t reopen soon. Should the lower limit approach, it would hamstring the ability of the government to offset higher crude prices and continue to apply upward pressure to inflation. That could likewise keep rates higher for longer as the Fed is either forced to hold or even tighten to combat rising prices.


SPR Used to Combat Gas Price Pressure, Floor Could Limit Efficacy

Throughout history, the SPR has been used to combat prices at the pump with the most severe drawdowns occurring coincident to spiking gasoline. Prior to the conflict in Iran, the SPR fell by 262.6 million barrels during the pandemic and subsequent Ukraine war as the government sought to ease consumer stress as the national average gas price pierced $5/gallon by mid-2022. Likewise, as prices at the pump have gotten close to $4.50 during the conflict with Iran, the SPR has been drawn down by another 66.2 million barrels to 349.2 million. Estimates suggest the floor is at about 20% of max capacity or 140 million barrels and as that level approaches, the government could lose a key tool they’ve used to limit the hit to the consumer.

Though services have been the biggest contributor to resurgent consumer inflation, rising energy prices are the second biggest share, and a similar dynamic is apparent within producer prices. The Fed typically leans on core measures of inflation to set rate-policy but Kevin Warsh’s elevation to chair might result in alternative measures – mainly trimmed mean inflation – being used instead. Rather than removing food and energy from the equation blindly every month, trimmed mean removes any categories that register as outliers. This raises the risk of higher energy prices filtering through rate policy as well.


Disclosure: HB Wealth is an SEC registered investment adviser. The information reflects the author’s views, opinions, and analyses as the publication date. The information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any investment product. This information contains forward-looking statements, predictions, and forecasts (“forward-looking statements”) concerning the belief and opinions in respect to the future. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and undue reliance should not be placed on them. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. The information does not represent legal, tax, accounting, or investment advice; recipients should consult their respective advisors regarding such matters. Certain information herein is based on third-party sources believed to be reliable, but which have not been independently verified. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results; inherent in any investment is the risk of loss.

A woman with long brown hair wearing a blue blazer and a necklace smiles at the camera. The background is softly blurred with light and blue tones.

Gina Martin Adams, CFA, CMT

Chief Market Strategist, Shareholder

Gina Martin Adams, CFA, CMT, is the Chief Market Strategist for HB Wealth. With more than 25 years of experience at leading global financial institutions, Adams brings deep expertise in market analysis, thematic research, and translating complex economic trends into actionable strategies. She collaborates with HB Wealth’s investment team to deliver timely market perspectives, share actionable insights, and enhance the firm’s visibility as a leading voice in the industry. She contributes to advancing proprietary research, supporting the development of new investment products, and enhancing the client experience through thought leadership and education. She pursues a top-down perspective and model-based approach, leveraging fundamental, technical, and quantitative perspectives to inform investment decisions, and frequently presents her views in the media and at industry conferences, professional associations and investment organizations.

A young man with short brown hair, wearing a dark suit, white shirt, and blue tie, stands in front of a blurred background with lights and blue tones.

Matthew Sanders

Senior Investment Research Analyst

A man in a blue suit and tie smiles at the camera against a blurred blue and white background.

Michael Casper, CFA

Director, Senior Market Strategist

Related Insights & News

Mag-7 Slowdown May Be Offset by 493’s Gain as Economy Syncs Back Up

Abstract: The Magnificent-7 has struggled relative to the rest of the market for most of…

Read More

Can SpaceX Break the Post Pandemic IPO Curse?

Abstract:  SpaceX kicked off what is likely to be a wave of historically large IPOs…

Read More

Stocks are Frothy, but This Bull Isn’t Yet a Tech Bubble Repeat

Abstract: U.S. stocks’ multi-year rally looks eerily similar to textbook bubbles that formed ahead of…

Read More

As AI Fireworks Fade, Smaller Caps May Maintain Spark

Abstract: The undercurrents of the equity market are worth paying attention to, for while parabolic…

Read More

The above is not a recommendation to purchase or sell a particular security and is not legal, investment or tax advice. Results are not guaranteed. All investing involves risk.

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results for any investment. Private alternative investments are not for every client. An individual must be qualified to invest in a private investment based on their net worth and/or other criteria, and they may qualify to invest in some alternative investments while not being allowed to invest in other alternative investments. Alternative investments are not risk-free and there is no guarantee of achieving attractive performance compared to similar liquid investments. Risks associated with investments in private alternatives include the illiquid nature of such investments, risks associated with leveraged investments, manager-specific risks, sector-specific risks, and in certain cases geographical risk, as well as the risk of loss of principal.