S&P 500 is Losing its Supporting Cast. Watch Financials

Though the headline decline in the S&P 500 of 3% over the last two weeks may at first appear benign, underlying supports for the index are fading fast, as war in the Middle East has depleted breadth at the stock and sector levels.  While most investors are watching the price of oil for signals, the stock market is also likely to get its cue from financials, the second largest sector by market cap in the S&P 500, and an early cycle indicator for the economy. Even if war is resolved and the price of oil calms, financials participation will be key to a durable market advance.

S&P 500 Breadth is Deteriorating

The S&P 500 is losing its breadth at both the stock and sector level, suggesting that the 3% drop in the index year to date may be masking emerging weakness.  The percentage of stocks on the index that remain above their 200-day moving average has dropped near fifty, a level that usually offers support during uptrends.  While short-term losses of breadth can occur with no consequence on occasion, a longer-term breakdown in breadth below the 50% level could indicate more severe stress is emerging for the index.  Notably, each correction of 10% or more in stocks over the last twenty years has occurred with this confirming breadth cue.  

Line chart showing S&P 500 index rising from 2004 to 2024 as the percentage of members above their 200-day moving average declines to 51%, indicating faltering market breadth.

Energy is now the only sector in the large cap index with positive short- and long-term momentum. Though the energy sector has had a stellar year, up nearly 28%, it is highly unlikely that this group can manage to hold up the market alone.  At less than 4% of market cap of the index, energy is too small to keep the index afloat on its own, and its identity as a cost input to the other sectors creates broader complications for earnings. Prior to the breakout of war, staples, materials, industrials, utilities and real estate were all also posting gains this year, but all of those sectors have sold off since the war began, leaving little upward momentum remaining in the S&P 500.

Bar chart titled S&P 500 Sector Performance showing YTD and MTD returns (%) for sectors. Energy leads with highest returns; Financials show the largest negative returns. YTD bars are dark blue; MTD bars are light blue.

Financials Cue Should be Watched Most Closely

While the markets remain captive to the price of oil in the short run, financials stocks may be the more meaningful indicator to watch for longer term market direction.  Financials are the worst performer among sectors in the S&P 500 so far this year.  The group is down more than 11%, more than 4X the decline in the market at large.  That’s the worst 10-week performance for the sector since April 2025. 

Financials entered the year with lofty expectations, indicated by valuations at levels last recorded prior to the Great Financial Crisis, which may have made the sector more vulnerable to disappointment. Nonetheless, the tough combination of private credit strains, the flattening yield curve, and threats of policy intervention in the housing and banking industries may continue to suppress returns for the group.  This may remain a problem for stocks at large. Since 1990, a monthly loss in financials coincided with a monthly loss in the broad market 74.7% of the time, with financials down in 182 months and the market down 136 of those months.  When financials and tech are struggling together, as has been the case for most of 2026, It is even more unlikely the market at large can rise.  When financials and tech sectors both sold off, the market dropped in 94.2% of months.

Bar chart showing the percent of S&P 500 index returns when financial sector prices decline for one month. 75% are negative during financial declines; 94% are negative when both tech and financials decline. Data as of March 2023.

While the price of oil and performance of energy stocks may continue to draw the lion’s share of attention in the near term, we think financials may offer a stronger indication of the longer-term trend.  Financials loss of momentum prior to the war and continued struggles during the last two weeks is notable, and hints that even without the war, a meaningful disruption in the market and economy may be underway.


Disclosure: HB Wealth is an SEC‑registered investment adviser. The information reflects the author’s views, opinions, and analyses as the publication date. The information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any investment product. This information contains forward-looking statements, predictions, and forecasts (“forward-looking statements”) concerning the belief and opinions in respect to the future. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and undue reliance should not be placed on them. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. The information does not represent legal, tax, accounting, or investment advice; recipients should consult their respective advisors regarding such matters. Certain information herein is based on third-party sources believed to be reliable, but which have not been independently verified. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results; inherent in any investment is the risk of loss.

A woman with long brown hair wearing a blue blazer and a necklace smiles at the camera. The background is softly blurred with light and blue tones.

Gina Martin Adams, CFA, CMT

Chief Market Strategist, Shareholder

Gina Martin Adams, CFA, CMT, is the Chief Market Strategist for HB Wealth. With more than 25 years of experience at leading global financial institutions, Adams brings deep expertise in market analysis, thematic research, and translating complex economic trends into actionable strategies. She collaborates with HB Wealth’s investment team to deliver timely market perspectives, share actionable insights, and enhance the firm’s visibility as a leading voice in the industry. She contributes to advancing proprietary research, supporting the development of new investment products, and enhancing the client experience through thought leadership and education. She pursues a top-down perspective and model-based approach, leveraging fundamental, technical, and quantitative perspectives to inform investment decisions, and frequently presents her views in the media and at industry conferences, professional associations and investment organizations.

A young man with short brown hair, wearing a dark suit, white shirt, and blue tie, stands in front of a blurred background with lights and blue tones.

Matthew Sanders

Senior Investment Research Analyst

Related Insights & News

Break of Support Increases Chances of a Tough Spring for Stocks

The S&P 500 has broken through key support at its 100-day and 20-week moving average…

Read More

When Defense Wins Ballgames: Job Losses and Oil Price Gains

U.S. large cap stocks have broken down through the key 100-day moving average support level…

Read More

Private Credit Concerns Fail to Fluster Bonds, Have Stocks on Edge

It is no secret that private credit redemptions are rising as concerns about default risk…

Read More

War in the Middle East: Outcomes Center on Oil’s Cue

Geopolitical risks may weigh on the outlook for stocks in the short run, with the…

Read More

The above is not a recommendation to purchase or sell a particular security and is not legal, investment or tax advice. Results are not guaranteed. All investing involves risk.

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results for any investment. Private alternative investments are not for every client. An individual must be qualified to invest in a private investment based on their net worth and/or other criteria, and they may qualify to invest in some alternative investments while not being allowed to invest in other alternative investments. Alternative investments are not risk-free and there is no guarantee of achieving attractive performance compared to similar liquid investments. Risks associated with investments in private alternatives include the illiquid nature of such investments, risks associated with leveraged investments, manager-specific risks, sector-specific risks, and in certain cases geographical risk, as well as the risk of loss of principal.