U.S. Large Caps Have a Problem of Extraordinary Expectations

Recent rotation has helped resolve some of U.S. large cap stocks’ valuation excesses, but risks remain to the downside for U.S. multiples. Large cap growth’s sales multiple is still near its all-time high, at about 6X, and growth’s earnings multiple may still be at least 15% too rich to value. The eye-popping growth premium is not the only evident excess in stocks, however, for now large cap value stocks are also trading very near all-time high valuations. These very high expectations have started to weigh on U.S. large cap growth stocks and may remain a problem for U.S. large cap returns overall in the near term.

U.S. large cap growth stocks have underperformed value counterparts by 11% so far in 2026 and 18% since their relative peak in October of last year, helping to resolve some of the abnormally large valuation premium that developed for growth in 2025. However, the premium for large cap growth stocks is still well above long term norms, even after the style’s recent correction. At a forward P/E of 25.7X, Russell 1000 growth trades 7.5X above Russell 1000 value stocks’ P/E of 18.2X. The growth premium was more than 75% in October, when the growth index touched a multiple of 31.1X, nearly equivalent to its 2021 absolute peak. On average since the end of the tech-bubble and until the pandemic (2003-2019), Russell 1000 Growth traded at a 25% premium to its value counterpart, but the current P/E premium is still 40%.

Line chart comparing the Russell 1000 Growth and Value indices forward P/E ratios from 1996 to 2024. Growth peaks near 45 in 2000 and ends at 25.7; Value stays lower, ending at 18.2.


The price-to-sales ratio shows an even larger valuation extreme for growth, and a bigger valuation gap between growth and value stocks. Growth stocks still command a premium to value that is even higher than either the tech bubble or the 2021 peak, with the growth index trading nearly 6X sales, 4X above its value counterpart.  At the peak in the tech bubble, the Russell 1000 growth index P/S ratio was 5.5X, or 4.2x turns above the value ratio of 1.3X.  And in the 2003-2019 period, the growth index traded at an average premium of 0.76X to large cap value stocks.  Growth stocks may face a reasonably high probability of valuation compression, particularly if any sales disappointments emerge. 

Line graph showing the price-to-sales ratio of Russell 1000 Growth and Value from 1998 to 2024. Growth peaks near 6.0 in 2021 and again in 2024 at 5.95, while Value remains steady, reaching 2.19 in 2024.

Though the growth premium is still most bloated, it is worth noting that value stocks are also trading at a premium to pre-pandemic norms.  Current P/Es of 25.7X for Growth and 18.2X for Value are both well north of long-term averages, and price-to-sales ratios for both growth and value are very near long-term peaks.  Excluding the tech bubble and the post-pandemic period, the Russell 1000 Growth index has traded at an average P/S multiple of 2.0X, or 0.7X above value’s average multiple of 1.3X.  

Herein lies the potential problem for U.S. large cap stocks – it may be tough for valuations to press much higher unless companies can positively surprise elevated expectations.  This may limit price growth to the rate of growth of fundamental improvements.  Growth stocks’ premium is extreme and thus may be most at risk of correcting if disappointments emerge, but it also may be unlikely that value stocks can re-rate much higher to offset any broad index drag from growth multiples.  High multiples overall may limit U.S. large caps price appreciation potential, as they imply abnormally strong fundamentals are already embedded in expectations.  Given such extended valuations, large cap stocks should be expected to rise, at best, at the pace of earnings growth.

Disclosure: HB Wealth is an SEC registered investment adviser. The information reflects the author’s views, opinions, and analyses as the publication date. The information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any investment product. This information contains forward-looking statements, predictions, and forecasts (“forward-looking statements”) concerning the belief and opinions in respect to the future. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and undue reliance should not be placed on them. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. The information does not represent legal, tax, accounting, or investment advice; recipients should consult their respective advisors regarding such matters. Certain information herein is based on third-party sources believed to be reliable, but which have not been independently verified. Past performance is not a guarantee or indicator of future results; inherent in any investment is the risk of loss.

A woman with long brown hair wearing a blue blazer and a necklace smiles at the camera. The background is softly blurred with light and blue tones.

Gina Martin Adams, CFA, CMT

Chief Market Strategist, Shareholder

Gina Martin Adams, CFA, CMT, is the Chief Market Strategist for HB Wealth. With more than 25 years of experience at leading global financial institutions, Adams brings deep expertise in market analysis, thematic research, and translating complex economic trends into actionable strategies. She collaborates with HB Wealth’s investment team to deliver timely market perspectives, share actionable insights, and enhance the firm’s visibility as a leading voice in the industry. She contributes to advancing proprietary research, supporting the development of new investment products, and enhancing the client experience through thought leadership and education. She pursues a top-down perspective and model-based approach, leveraging fundamental, technical, and quantitative perspectives to inform investment decisions, and frequently presents her views in the media and at industry conferences, professional associations and investment organizations.

A young man with short brown hair, wearing a dark suit, white shirt, and blue tie, stands in front of a blurred background with lights and blue tones.

Matthew Sanders

Senior Investment Research Analyst

Related Insights & News

A person with a backpack stands on a mountain ledge looking at distant blue hills. Text reads: “Market Sense by HB Wealth. Growth Investing May Have Peaked with the Pandemic. February 10, 2026.”.

Growth Investing May Have Peaked with the Pandemic

After outperforming for most of the last three years, growth stocks have been struggling relative…

Read More

A person stands on a mountain overlooking a scenic, misty landscape. Beside them, text reads: Market Sense by HB Wealth. Don’t Ignore Inflation Risk in 2026. February 6, 2026.

Don’t Ignore Inflation Risk in 2026

Elevated fiscal spending, easy monetary policy, trade tensions and geopolitical strains may imply inflation risk…

Read More

A person stands on a mountain peak overlooking misty blue hills at sunrise, next to text reading, “Market Sense by HB Wealth: Tech’s Time Close to the Sun May Be Ending, and It Means a New Market Landscape,” dated February 5, 2026.

Tech’s Time Close to the Sun May Be Ending, and It Means a New Market Landscape

U.S. equity markets’ rotation out of technology has come a long way over the last…

Read More

A person with a backpack stands on a rocky outcrop overlooking mountain ranges. Text reads: Market Sense by HB Wealth. Stocks are Expensive – What Does That Mean for Returns? February 2, 2026.

Stocks are Expensive – What Does That Mean for Returns?

U.S. large cap stocks ended 2025 in rare valuations territory, with the cyclically adjusted PE…

Read More

The above is not a recommendation to purchase or sell a particular security and is not legal, investment or tax advice. Results are not guaranteed. All investing involves risk.

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results for any investment. Private alternative investments are not for every client. An individual must be qualified to invest in a private investment based on their net worth and/or other criteria, and they may qualify to invest in some alternative investments while not being allowed to invest in other alternative investments. Alternative investments are not risk-free and there is no guarantee of achieving attractive performance compared to similar liquid investments. Risks associated with investments in private alternatives include the illiquid nature of such investments, risks associated with leveraged investments, manager-specific risks, sector-specific risks, and in certain cases geographical risk, as well as the risk of loss of principal.